<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stedavies.com &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stedavies.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stedavies.com</link>
	<description>the blog of consultant Stephen Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Corporate Blogging &#8211; a dying fad?</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switzerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;ve just returned from the Communication on Top conference held in Davos, Switzerland and what a great conference it was too with lots of insightful and thought-provoking presentations from communication professionals from around the world. I had a fantastic time and made some new friends along the way. It was also great to share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I&#8217;ve just returned from the <a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/"><span class="drop">C</span>ommunication on Top conference</a> held in Davos, Switzerland and what a great conference it was too with lots of insightful and thought-provoking presentations from communication professionals from around the world. I had a fantastic time and made some new friends along the way. It was also great to share a lift to the airport with keynoter <a href="http://www.holmesreport.com/blog/">Paul Holmes</a> of the <a href="http://www.holmesreport.com/">Holmes Report</a> and <a href="http://www.holmesreport.com/sabre_info.cfm">Sabre Awards</a>. A cracking guy.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my presentation for anyone that&#8217;s interested.</p>
<div id="__ss_3055387" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;">
<p><a style="font: 14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; display: block; margin: 12px 0 3px 0; text-decoration: underline;" title="Corporate Blogging A Dying Fad" href="http://www.slideshare.net/3wpr/corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad">Corporate Blogging A Dying Fad</a></p>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/3wpr">Stephen Davies</a>.</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object style="margin: 0px;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="494" height="413" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=corporatebloggingadyingfad-100202112921-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="margin: 0px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="494" height="413" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=corporatebloggingadyingfad-100202112921-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The view from my hotel room</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Davos by stedavies, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/prblogger/4343923993/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/4343923993_6c0dcf774b.jpg" alt="Davos" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/corporate-blogging-a-dying-fad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Trends of 20-somethings</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/ten-trends-of-20-somethings/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/ten-trends-of-20-somethings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A friend of mine is doing the PR around the One Young World initiative which is being touted as &#8216;the Davos for young people&#8217; and which is taking place in London on 8th &#8211; 10th February. It&#8217;s a very interesting concept and I&#8217;m disappointed that I&#8217;ll miss it since (ironically) I&#8217;ll be in Davos [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A friend of mine is doing the PR around the <a href="http://www.oneyoungworld.com/"><span class="drop">O</span>ne Young World</a> initiative which is being touted as &#8216;the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_economic_forum">Davos </a>for young people&#8217; and which is taking place in London on 8th &#8211; 10th February. It&#8217;s a very interesting concept and I&#8217;m disappointed that I&#8217;ll miss it since (ironically) I&#8217;ll be in Davos for the <a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/">Communication on Top Forum</a> over the same period.</p>
<p>From the press release, &#8220;A group of the world’s most influential leaders will descend upon London on Feb. 8, 2010. Kofi Annan, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Sir Bob Geldof, former President of Peru Alejandro Toledo, HRM Crown Prince Haakon of Norway and U.S. Sen. John Kerry will all gather in service of several hundreds delegates representing the world’s youth.</p>
<p>&#8220;The One Young World Inaugural Summit is the event drawing the international spectrum of leaders, but, more important, say founders, the first-ever leadership summit for people age 25 and under is bringing together young leaders from the world’s 192 countries to confront today’s major global challenges.&#8221;</p>
<p>The announcement of the event coincides with a piece of research which is apparently one of the largest global youth studies ever undertaken which identified the top ten trends of 20-somethings. Findings below:</p>
<p><strong>1. Real-time expectations</strong></p>
<p>Anyone in his or her 20s living in an economically developed community has never known life without instant communication everywhere. Twenty-somethings communicate with friends on the go, in real time—no waiting for snail mail. They get the latest news as it happens, with a live feed from where it’s happening—no waiting for the scheduled news on TV or radio. Whenever they need to dig out information about virtually anything, it’s there, in abundance; there’s no need to dig around in books.</p>
<p>Twenty-somethings are riding the wave of real-time living. If it’s not real time, 20-somethings switch their focus to something that is.</p>
<p><strong>2. Living more intense local lives</strong></p>
<p>One of the great paradoxes of borderless, global real-time technology is the way it reinforces local connections.</p>
<p>As adept users of real-time technology, 20-somethings are able to live locally more intensely. With mobile devices they make social arrangements on the fly. With location-based services through Google and others, they can locate friends who happen to be nearby; they can also get alerts from whichever companies in the vicinity are offering interesting deals.</p>
<p>Facebook typifies the paradox. Now with 350 million users worldwide, it was started by 20-somethings at Harvard for local users. It grew by extending its services to other local groups (e.g. other Ivy League universities). Like many big cities, Facebook is just an amalgam of discrete localities.</p>
<p><span id="more-2684"></span></p>
<p><strong>3. Radically transparent</strong></p>
<p>Twenty-somethings have grown up with reality TV and radical celebrity culture—media poking into every corner of people’s lives, from Hollywood A-listers right down to the lowliest got-lucky types who copped their 15 minutes of fame by accident. They’ve grown up in a culture of the highest-level confidential information “leaks,” a world where even the great and the good confess mistakes and show emotion to millions.</p>
<p>In their personal lives they are constantly using technologies with which they can bare all—sometimes literally—to their friends. They are more or less aware that online nothing can be considered confidential, but they go ahead anyway.</p>
<p>Right or wrong, this is a generation that’s on a clear trend toward being more transparent about its thoughts, feelings and actions than has any previous generation.</p>
<p><strong>4. Expecting cheap or free everything</strong></p>
<p>Globalization has made many essentials of life very cheap. Twenty-somethings are used to a world where value and discounted offerings are everywhere. They can fill their stomachs and clothe themselves at unbelievably low cost. Budget airline travel is normal for them. The Internet has accustomed them to getting music, software and services for free, either legally or illegally. After all, one of the biggest, most powerful brands on the planet (Google) offers a huge range of powerful services at no cost to the user.</p>
<p>The trend of cheap or free expectations among 20-somethings will increasingly shape business models.</p>
<p><strong>5. Entertainment must be part of the deal</strong></p>
<p>In some parts of the world—particularly the West—fun and entertainment have long become an essential part of education. Twenty-somethings have grown up with Sesame Street and animated, interactive, fun graphics in the classroom and in museums. Hence the notion of Edutainment.</p>
<p>All over the world, even in places where older, more dutiful approaches to education prevail, fun and games have become a staple activity of young people. These have been promoted by corporations and endorsed by researchers as beneficial.</p>
<p>In an extensive 38-country online survey of 15,844 young adults aged 23-28 fielded by SurveyShack in association with YouGovStone between July 2008 and December 2009, 59 percent of respondents said they regularly play video or computer games in their spare time; this makes gaming the second-most popular activity after socializing (61 percent).</p>
<p><strong>6. Worrying about the planet</strong></p>
<p>Twenty-somethings are certainly keen on play and entertainment, but there’s a more serious undertone affecting their lives. Every day they are exposed to more and more worrying reports about what’s going wrong with the planet: climate change, disappearing species, habitat destruction and water shortages have been daily fare for 20-somethings through all their adult life.</p>
<p>In the survey, 64 percent of respondents saw climate change affecting them seriously in their lifetime and 82 percent saw it affecting future generations seriously; 64 percent thought that only immediate radical changes can prevent the most serious impacts of climate change.</p>
<p>Going forward, assuming the planetary news doesn’t improve, the worrying trend of 20-somethings will become the norm.</p>
<p><strong>7. Seeing luxuries as standard</strong></p>
<p>Twenty-somethings now think nothing of paying significant amounts for key products and services that are actually luxuries by historical standards. Whether they’re paid for by parents or out of their own money, normal life for 20-somethings now includes:<br />
·        A mobile device of some sort (e.g. smart phone, iPod Touch) with a camera, costing well above $100, plus monthly fees<br />
·        A computer costing at least $300, with monthly broadband fees on top<br />
·        A wide-screen TV, costing at least $300, with cable and satellite fees on top<br />
·        Higher education as far as they can go—bachelor’s degree, postgraduate studies</p>
<p><strong>8. Pro-business, anti-multinational</strong></p>
<p>Today’s 20-somethings are far removed from the left-wing and countercultural ideologies that fired up young people in the late 1960s and early 1970s. All around the world they’ve been raised in an environment in which free markets were regarded as the solution to everything and which certainly delivered plenty of consumer goodies to make life more fun. Twenty-somethings aren’t anti-business. After all, some of their favorite brands were founded by 20-somethings. Their lives are filled with the things that business has produced.</p>
<p>However, they’re not so keen on multinational corporations. In the survey, two-thirds of respondents (66 percent) think global corporations have too much power, and 81 percent think global corporations must behave responsibly and ethically.</p>
<p>Multinational corporations have long been the object of concern for a few; now, as Generation Real-Time shares information fast, they’re becoming the concern of many young people. This time around, the young people don’t aspire to bring those big corporations down by force; instead, they aspire to out-business them.</p>
<p><strong>9. Regulate the heck out of media bias</strong></p>
<p>Media 2010 is a lot bigger field than it was in 2000 or 1990. Titles in traditional formats (TV, radio and print) are now available through the Internet, along with others that only exist on the Internet. Increasingly diverse media titles and news sources are available to anyone with the curiosity to click on a link. No wonder a substantial 70 percent of respondents in the survey get their news via the Internet.</p>
<p>The broader choice of media, plus increasing educational levels and media savvy, makes 20-somethings more aware than ever of media bias; they can compare versions of the same story and read commentary from different angles. This is probably why 70 percent of respondents think all news media should be regulated so that it’s clearly independent of state and corporate bias.</p>
<p>At the same time, they don’t want government to regulate social media. It’s called MySpace, after all.</p>
<p><strong>10. Naturally Me but aspiring to We</strong></p>
<p>Self, personal and personalized have been abiding themes throughout lives of today’s 20-somethings: self-expression, self-esteem, personal computers, personal profiles, personalized settings, personal development and personal branding—also known as A Brand Called Me. Whether the national culture is highly individualistic (e.g. United States) or more collectivist (e.g. China), technology and business have thrived by enabling people to express themselves: to be more Me.</p>
<p>Culturally and commercially, 20-somethings have been indulged and encouraged to be more selfish than were previous generations. Yet they are also now acutely aware that everyone pursuing selfish interests creates the planetary problems that are worrying them.</p>
<p>Hence the trend of 20-somethings caught between the impulse to do their own thing and the desire to do the right thing together. Or as the pithy observation has it, “Everybody wants to save the earth; nobody wants to help mom do the dishes.” </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/ten-trends-of-20-somethings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube: the channel of choice for C-level execs</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/youtube-the-channel-of-choice-for-c-level-execs/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/youtube-the-channel-of-choice-for-c-level-execs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Something bad happened to your company? Scandal occurring? Negative press from the traditional media outlets? Reputation damage? There&#8217;s always YouTube. 
YouTube is becoming the communication channel of choice among senior executives during a time of crisis. CEOs, presidents and other important senior staff are using YouTube to go direct to their stakeholders while cutting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Something bad happened to your company? Scandal occurring? Negative press from the traditional media outlets? Reputation damage? There&#8217;s always YouTube. </p>
<p><span class="drop">Y</span>ouTube is becoming the communication channel of choice among senior executives during a time of crisis. CEOs, presidents and other important senior staff are using YouTube to go direct to their stakeholders while cutting out the (often negative) traditional media in the process. </p>
<p>The latest example is Toyota Motor Sales President &#038; COO, Jim Lentz (see below) who is using YouTube to communicate with customers regarding the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/feb/02/faulty-cars-recalled-toyota-reputation">recent news of the the sticking pedals</a>. </p>
<p>But Mr Lentz is not the first as you will see below. </p>
<p><strong>Toyota Motor Sales President &#038; COO, Jim Lentz</strong></p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZCb2dEFBq7I&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZCb2dEFBq7I&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Founder and CEO of jetBlue Airways, David Neeleman.</strong> (No longer CEO) </p>
<p>After jetBlue customers suffered terrible conditions and waiting times at JFK Airport which was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/17/business/17air.html?ex=1329454800&#038;en=e8ec4290afb76497&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">subsequently documented in the press</a>, Neeleman used YouTube to make a public apology and to outline what the company intended to do. </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-r_PIg7EAUw&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-r_PIg7EAUw&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>President of Domino&#8217;s, Patrick Doyle</strong></p>
<p>Basically: Two Domino&#8217;s Pizza staff <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhBmWxQpedI">uploaded a video to YouTube</a> of themselves doing disgusting things to the fast food chain&#8217;s food. The video spread like wildfire and negative press ensued which caused president of Domino&#8217;s, Patrick Doyle, to upload his own video to YouTube to alert customers and other interested parties on the company&#8217;s reaction to the video and the steps it had taken. </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dem6eA7-A2I&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dem6eA7-A2I&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>CEO of Mattel, Bob Eckert</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2007/nov/06/uknews">Mattel had to recall over 1 million Chinese-made toys</a> because of potential hazards from parts of the toys which were colored using lead-based paint. It was found that the amount of lead in the paint exceeded US government limits. Bob Eckert looked to quash worries by posting this YouTube clip. </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xH9O8JlvOe4&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xH9O8JlvOe4&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>Notice one thing? They&#8217;re all American. Having spoke with many UK (and European) PR execs over the years about deploying such tactics I&#8217;ve found that the majority of PR people don&#8217;t think it would work as well in their respective countries. Personally, I think it depends.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2010/02/youtube-the-channel-of-choice-for-c-level-execs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Inconvenient PR Truth &#8211; time to end PR pollution</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2010/01/an-inconvenient-pr-truth-time-to-end-pr-pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2010/01/an-inconvenient-pr-truth-time-to-end-pr-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.inconvenientprtruth.com

1.7 billion irrelevant press release emails estimated to be received in total each year by UK and US Journalists alone


78% of press release emails are received by Recipients to whom they are irrelevant


55% of Recipients have taken action to block a sender of news


Disclosure: RealWire is a client and I was involved in this campaign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://inconvenientprtruth.com/"><span class="drop">w</span>ww.inconvenientprtruth.com</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>1.7 billion irrelevant press release emails estimated to be received in total each year by UK and US Journalists alone</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>78% of press release emails are received by Recipients to whom they are irrelevant</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>55% of Recipients have taken action to block a sender of news</strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=9020095&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=e2871f&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=9020095&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=e2871f&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Disclosure: RealWire is a client and I was involved in this campaign </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2010/01/an-inconvenient-pr-truth-time-to-end-pr-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communication On Top &#8211; Davos, Switzerland 8 &#8211; 9 Feb</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/12/communication-on-top-davos-switzerland-8-9-feb/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2009/12/communication-on-top-davos-switzerland-8-9-feb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Catch me and a host of other professional communicators speaking at the Communication on Top conference in Davos on the 8 and 9 February. Very much looking forward to presenting and also viewing the other presentations outlined in the programme. 
 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Catch me and <a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/speakers"><span class="drop">a</span> host of other professional communicators</a> speaking at the <a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/">Communication on Top</a> conference in Davos on the 8 and 9 February. Very much looking forward to presenting and also viewing the other presentations <a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/program">outlined in the programme</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.forumdavos.com/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2589" title="banner" src="http://stedavies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/banner.jpg" alt="banner" width="575" height="137" /></a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2009/12/communication-on-top-davos-switzerland-8-9-feb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World in 2010</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Every year, on the run up to the New Year, my favourite publication, The Economist, publishes a special magazine titled ‘The World in&#8230;” which details a plethora of predictions – usually about world affairs &#8211; made by its team of staff and guest contributors. It’s a great read and gives some excellent insights in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <span style="float:left;color:#666;font:66px georgia;line-height:60px;padding:0 5px;"><span class="drop">E</span></span>very year, on the run up to the New Year, my favourite publication, <a href="http://www.economist.com/">The Economist</a>, publishes a special magazine titled ‘The World in&#8230;” which details a plethora of predictions – usually about world affairs &#8211; made by its team of staff and guest contributors. It’s a great read and gives some excellent insights in to where these super smart journalists and analysts think the world is heading in the coming year. They’re not always right, of course, and a couple of editions ago they failed to predict the then-looming financial crisis. That said, aside from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schiff">Peter Schiff</a> and Dr Doom himself, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouriel_Roubini">Nouriel Roubini</a>, who else did?</p>
<p>So, as we approach 2010 and the anticipation of The Economist’s latest ‘World in 2010’ (because I know, like me, you can’t wait either) I thought I’d have a stab at crystal ball gazing myself.</p>
<h4>Nothing to do with social media</h4>
<p>If you’re anything like me you’re probably sick of the end-of-year surplus supply of ‘what’s next in social media’ predictions being bandied about by the gurus. I prefer to use the social media that’s with us here and now in the real world. Navel gaze about that stuff all you like but it’s not going to help your clients much.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Recovery, recovery, recovery</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It’s safe to say that the worst of the financial crisis is behind us. That’s not to say we don’t have a tough time ahead however. Government debt is rampant, deficits are high and unemployment is improving, but only in the sense that the rate of unemployment has plateaued. All that said, and despite the delicacy of the situation, we’ll begin to see an improvement in confidence as private companies begin to unbatten the hatches, make investments and begin to take on new staff. The public sector (in Britain at least) will be face cuts as governments try to repair their heavily damaged balance sheets.</p>
<h4>Prediction:</h4>
<p>A ‘V’ shaped recovery. The time it takes to get back where we were, though, will be long.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>BRICs get a greater say</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">As world power continues to shift from West to East (it’s happening) emerging economies including the so called BRIC countries (the moniker given to the rise of Brazil, Russia, India and China by Goldman Sachs) will get a seat at the table and a greater say in world events. Some countries like China have already raised concerns of the unfair workings of the G20 system.</p>
<h4>Prediction:</h4>
<p>China begins to accept its world/super power status and stops thinking of itself as an emerging economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Britain and Russia seek to warm cold ties </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Over the last few years the relationship between Britain and Russia has been, to put it mildly, somewhat cold. A number of controversial incidents in recent times have caused the two nations to do battle in political rhetoric and undiplomatic gestures. An alleged assassination by an ex-KGB operative, the war against Georgia and the deportation of British diplomats in Moscow are considered the three main catalysts for these sour relations.</p>
<p>Lately, however, both countries are engaging on friendlier terms as both share a common interest in preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear power. In a joint press conference at the beginning of November, both Britain’s Foreign Secretary and Russia’s Foreign Minister made a joint demand to Iran to respond to the United Nations on questions regarding its nuclear fuel.</p>
<h4>Prediction:</h4>
<p>Relations between the two countries continue to improve as both realise their joint vested interests.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Europe: not exactly water tight</strong></p>
<p>At a time when it soon elects its first permanent President of the European Council, British opposition leader, David Cameron, concedes defeat on the Lisbon Treaty and the two of its wealthiest nations, Germany and France, show unity during the financial crisis, you could say the European Union is stronger than ever. And you&#8217;d be right. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s in perfect harmony though.</p>
<p>There are still underlying issues as one might expect when trying to unify a group of nations with self interests. Britain perhaps the most maverick of member states has often been the least cooperative as it seeks to protect its interests in the financial industry. Nevertheless progress has been made and the announcement of the new president in January will only help solidify the European Union&#8217;s status as a superpower.</p>
<h4>Prediction:</h4>
<p>The President of the United States will have a single number to call when he wants to speak to Europe. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presentation on social media</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/presentation-on-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/presentation-on-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Because you&#8217;ve never seen one of those, right?  
This is one I delivered in Newcastle at a NEPA (North East Publicity Association) event on Monday night. It contains one or two UK social media examples in. Enjoy!
RSS subscribers please click through to see the presentation if it isn&#8217;t visible from your reader.

Social Media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Because you&#8217;ve never seen one of those, right? <img src='http://stedavies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span class="drop">T</span>his is one I delivered in Newcastle at a NEPA (North East Publicity Association) event on Monday night. It contains one or two UK social media examples in. Enjoy!</p>
<p>RSS subscribers <a href="http://stedavies.com/2009/11/presentation-on-social-media/">please click through to see the presentation</a> if it isn&#8217;t visible from your reader.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object style="margin: 0px;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="552" height="462" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=nepa-091109172252-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=social-media-marketing-2461438" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="margin: 0px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="552" height="462" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=nepa-091109172252-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=social-media-marketing-2461438" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div id="__ss_2461438" style="width: 425px; text-align: center;"><a style="margin: 12px 0pt 3px; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="Social Media Marketing" href="http://www.slideshare.net/3wpr/social-media-marketing-2461438">Social Media Marketing</a></p>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px; text-align: center;">View more <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/3wpr">Stephen Davies</a>.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/presentation-on-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye bye PRBLOGGER.COM</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/bye-bye-prblogger-com/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/bye-bye-prblogger-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hello stedavies.com. After four and a half years of the PR blogger moniker it&#8217;s time for a rebrand. Thanks to Milo the old URL has 301 redirects set up to ensure any loss of Google Juice is minimal. Fingers crossed you won&#8217;t have to subscribe to the new feed as it&#8217;s been transferred over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hello <a href="http://stedavies.com"><span class="drop">s</span>tedavies.com</a>. After four and a half years of the PR blogger moniker it&#8217;s time for a rebrand. Thanks to <a href="http://3oneseven.com/">Milo</a> the old URL has <a href="http://www.bfinternet.co.uk/news-info/articles/301-redirects-explained">301 redirects</a> set up to ensure any loss of Google Juice is minimal. Fingers crossed you won&#8217;t have to subscribe to the new feed as it&#8217;s been transferred over also. </p>
<p>For anyone who has me kindly linked to their blogroll I&#8217;d appreciate it if, for SEO purposes, you change it to the new URL. I&#8217;ll probably email a few people about it as well.</p>
<p>Onwards and upwards.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/bye-bye-prblogger-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK journalists on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2008/11/uk-journalists-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2008/11/uk-journalists-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prblogger.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I speak with regular PR folk about Twitter I often have a hard time convincing them of the benefits. It usually goes something like this, "Well you can talk to other people ... and and ... you follow them and, erm, sometimes other people add links to interesting things ... and you can talk to someone directly using the @ icon."

This conversation usually follows with me saying something along the lines of, "No, don't leave. Wait, I haven't explained myself properly. Wait! Honestly, it's really good. I'm really sorry."

Twitter isn't something that immediately strikes you as anything good and explaining the benefits of it to someone who has never heard of it - particularly a pressed for time PR person - can be quite difficult...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><span class="drop">N</span>otice: This blog post has been updated one year later. There is a bigger and better <a href="http://stedavies.com/2009/10/uk-journalists-on-twitter-update/">list of UK journalists on Twitter</a> here.</h4>
<p>When I speak with regular PR folk about Twitter I often have a hard time convincing them of the benefits. It usually goes something like this, &#8220;Well you can talk to other people &#8230; and and &#8230; you follow them and, erm, sometimes other people add links to interesting things &#8230; and you can talk to someone directly using the @ icon.&#8221;</p>
<p>This conversation usually follows with me saying something along the lines of, &#8220;No, don&#8217;t leave. Wait, I haven&#8217;t explained myself properly. Wait! Honestly, it&#8217;s really good. I&#8217;m really sorry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Twitter isn&#8217;t something that immediately strikes you as anything good and explaining the benefits of it to someone who has never heard of it &#8211; particularly a pressed for time PR person &#8211; can be quite difficult.</p>
<p>Worry not my friends for there is a way around it. Show them something on Twitter that is related to them and their work and watch their eyebrows raise. What&#8217;s that you say? Well in my experience I often show them a &#8216;tweeting journalist&#8217; (that&#8217;s a journalist who uses Twitter by the way) and immediately they begin asking questions.</p>
<p>(Note: I hope I don&#8217;t get in trouble for this like in <a href="http://www.stedavies.com/2006/10/uk100-bloggers/">I did here</a>. Happy to remove anyone that doesn&#8217;t want to be on here.)</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/stedavies"><br />
</a></p>
<h2><a href="http://twitter.com/stedavies">Add Me To Twitter</a></h2>
<h1>Freelance</h1>
<p>Mike Hills &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/mikewhills">http://twitter.com/mikewhills</a><br />
Roz Tappenden &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/roztappenden">http://twitter.com/roztappenden</a><br />
Emma Williams &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/emmawilliams">http://twitter.com/emmawilliams</a><br />
Kelly Rose &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/kellyrose">http://twitter.com/kellyrose</a><br />
Sally Whittle &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/swhittle">http://twitter.com/swhittle</a><br />
Lesley Smith &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/LesleySmith">http://twitter.com/LesleySmith</a><br />
Donald Strachan &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/hackneye">http://twitter.com/hackneye</a><br />
Gina Davies &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/ginadav">http://twitter.com/ginadav</a><br />
Siobhan O’Neill &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/SiobhanONeill">http://twitter.com/SiobhanONeill</a><br />
Michael Cross &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/michaelcross">http://twitter.com/michaelcross</a><br />
Scott Colvey &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/scolvey">http://twitter.com/scolvey</a><br />
Paul Carr &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/paulcarr">http://twitter.com/paulcarr</a><br />
Diane Shipley &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/whatdoyoudo">http://twitter.com/whatdoyoudo</a><br />
Neil Baker &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/neilbaker">http://twitter.com/neilbaker</a><br />
Guy Clapperton &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/GuyClapperton">http://twitter.com/GuyClapperton</a><br />
Louise Bolotin &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/louisebolotin">http://twitter.com/louisebolotin</a><br />
Linda Jones &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/Joner">http://twitter.com/Joner</a><br />
Bill Thompson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/billt">http://twitter.com/billt</a><br />
Chris Edwards &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/chrised">http://twitter.com/chrised</a><br />
Paul Bradshaw &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/paulbradshaw">http://twitter.com/paulbradshaw</a><br />
Simon Bisson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/sbisson">http://twitter.com/sbisson</a><br />
Danny Bradbury &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/dannybradbury">http://twitter.com/dannybradbury</a><br />
Tim Anderson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/timanderson">http://twitter.com/timanderson</a><br />
Mark Dye &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/markjdye">http://twitter.com/markjdye</a><br />
Simon Crisp &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/simoncrisp">http://twitter.com/simoncrisp</a><br />
Dominique Jackson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/deejackson">http://twitter.com/deejackson</a><br />
Sarah Ewing &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/SarahEwing">http://twitter.com/SarahEwing</a></p>
<h1>E-consultancy</h1>
<p>Chris Lake &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/lakey">http://twitter.com/lakey</a><br />
Linus Gregoriadis &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/linusgreg">http://twitter.com/linusgreg</a><br />
Graham Charlton &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/gcharlton">http://twitter.com/gcharlton</a></p>
<h1>BBC</h1>
<p>Tom van Aardt &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/tomVS">http://twitter.com/tomVS</a><br />
Richard Sambrook &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/sambrook">http://twitter.com/sambrook</a><br />
Tania Teixeira &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/taniateix">http://twitter.com/taniateix</a><br />
Jon Fildes &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/jonfildes">http://twitter.com/jonfildes</a><br />
Declan Curry &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/declancurry">http://twitter.com/declancurry</a><br />
Daren &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/darenBBC">http://twitter.com/darenBBC</a><br />
Dave Lee &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/davelee">http://twitter.com/davelee</a><br />
Rory Cellan-Jones &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/ruskin147">http://twitter.com/ruskin147</a><br />
Darren Waters -<a href=" http://twitter.com/djwaters1"> http://twitter.com/djwaters1</a></p>
<h1>The Guardian</h1>
<p>Neil McIntosh -<a href=" http://twitter.com/nmcintosh"> http://twitter.com/nmcintosh</a><br />
Charles Arthur &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/charlesarthur">http://twitter.com/charlesarthur</a><br />
Dave Hill &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/DaveHill">http://twitter.com/DaveHill</a><br />
Stephen Brook &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/SDBrook">http://twitter.com/SDBrook</a><br />
Cath Elliott &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/CathElliott">http://twitter.com/CathElliott</a><br />
Bobbie Johnson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/bobbiejohnson">http://twitter.com/bobbiejohnson</a><br />
Kevin Anderson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/kevglobal">http://twitter.com/kevglobal</a><br />
Jemima Kiss -<a href=" http://twitter.com/jemimakiss"> http://twitter.com/jemimakiss</a><br />
Kate Bevan -<a href=" http://twitter.com/katebevan"> http://twitter.com/katebevan</a><br />
James Anthony &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/jimboeth">http://twitter.com/jimboeth</a></p>
<h1>Financial Times</h1>
<p>Tim Bradshaw &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/tim">http://twitter.com/tim</a><br />
Chris Nuttall &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/ftchris">http://twitter.com/ftchris</a><br />
Peter Whitehead &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/peterwhitehead">http://twitter.com/peterwhitehead</a><br />
Richard Waters &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/richardwaters">http://twitter.com/richardwaters</a><br />
Kevin Allison &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinallisonft">http://twitter.com/kevinallisonft</a><br />
Kate Mackenzie &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/kmac">http://twitter.com/kmac</a><br />
Stacy Marie Ishmael &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/s_m_i">http://twitter.com/s_m_i</a><br />
Gideon Rachman &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/gideonrachman">http://twitter.com/gideonrachman</a></p>
<h1>The Telegraph</h1>
<p>Marcus Warren -<a href=" http://twitter.com/MarcusWa"> http://twitter.com/MarcusWa</a><br />
Ian Douglas &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/IanDouglas">http://twitter.com/IanDouglas</a><br />
Shane Richmond &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/shanerichmond">http://twitter.com/shanerichmond</a><br />
Justin Williams -<a href=" http://twitter.com/justin_williams"> http://twitter.com/justin_williams</a><br />
Catherine Gee &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/catherinegee">http://twitter.com/catherinegee</a><br />
Claudia Beaumont &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/claudineb">http://twitter.com/claudineb</a><br />
Heidi Blake &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/HeidiBlake">http://twitter.com/HeidiBlake</a></p>
<h1>Computing</h1>
<p>Bryan Glick &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/bryanglick">http://twitter.com/bryanglick</a><br />
Angelica Mari &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/angelicamari">http://twitter.com/angelicamari</a><br />
Mark Kobayashi &#8211; <a href="Hillary http://twitter.com/markhillary">Hillary http://twitter.com/markhillary</a></p>
<h1>MSN UK</h1>
<p>Peter Bale <a href="http://twitter.com/PeterBale">http://twitter.com/PeterBale</a><br />
Katie King <a href="http://twitter.com/ktking">http://twitter.com/ktking</a><br />
Jane Douglas <a href="http://twitter.com/msntechjane">http://twitter.com/msntechjane</a><br />
Nik Taylor <a href="http://twitter.com/msntechnik">http://twitter.com/msntechnik</a><br />
Monica Stylli <a href="http://twitter.com/msnstylemonica">http://twitter.com/msnstylemonica</a><br />
Laura Snook <a href="http://twitter.com/LauraJSnook">http://twitter.com/LauraJSnook</a><br />
Matt Ball &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/thisismattball">http://twitter.com/thisismattball</a></p>
<h1>Birmingham Post</h1>
<p>Joanna Geary &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/BhamPostJoanna">http://twitter.com/BhamPostJoanna</a><br />
Marc Reeves &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/marcreeves">http://twitter.com/marcreeves</a><br />
Richard Padgett &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/richardpadgett">http://twitter.com/richardpadgett</a><br />
Mike Hughes &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/mikehughes">http://twitter.com/mikehughes</a><br />
Tom Scotney &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/TomScotney">http://twitter.com/TomScotney</a><br />
Joanna Geary &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/joannageary">http://twitter.com/joannageary</a></p>
<h1>Manchester Evening News</h1>
<p>Sarah Hartley &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/foodiesarah">http://twitter.com/foodiesarah</a><br />
Christina McDermott &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/MissCay">http://twitter.com/MissCay</a></p>
<h1>Middlesbrough Evening Gazette</h1>
<p>Julie Martin &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/jules_27">http://twitter.com/jules_27</a><br />
David MacLean &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/davidmaclean">http://twitter.com/davidmaclean</a></p>
<h1>Journalism.co.uk</h1>
<p>J Townend &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/JTownend">http://twitter.com/JTownend</a><br />
Laura Oliver &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/LauraOliver">http://twitter.com/LauraOliver</a></p>
<h1>Other</h1>
<p>Azeem Ahmad &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/Azeem_A">http://twitter.com/Azeem_A</a> (Environmental News Online)<br />
Paul Cockerton &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/paulcockerton">http://twitter.com/paulcockerton</a> (Lancashire Telegraph)<br />
Jo Wadsworth &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/jowadsworth">http://twitter.com/jowadsworth</a> (Croydon Advertiser)<br />
Chris Henwood &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/thisismattball">http://twitter.com/thisismattball</a> &#8211; (Birmingham Mail)<br />
Sam Shepherd &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/SamShepherd">http://twitter.com/SamShepherd</a> (Bournemouth Daily Echo)<br />
Andy Walker -<a href=" http://twitter.com/andywalker82"> http://twitter.com/andywalker82</a> (Birmingham Sunday Mercury)<br />
Alan Burkitt-Grey &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/alanburkittgray">http://twitter.com/alanburkittgray</a> (Global Telecoms Business)<br />
Jono Russell &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/Jono">http://twitter.com/Jono</a> (SPIN World Cricket Monthly)<br />
Mark Ogier &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/MarkOgier">http://twitter.com/MarkOgier</a> (Guernsey Press)<br />
Charlie Elise &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/charlie_elise">http://twitter.com/charlie_elise</a> (The HR Director)<br />
Katherine Hannaford &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/clashcityrocker">http://twitter.com/clashcityrocker</a> (T3)<br />
Kirsty W &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/zimjourno">http://twitter.com/zimjourno</a> (unknown)<br />
Andrew Lim &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/andylim">http://twitter.com/andylim</a> (CNET UK)<br />
Rachel Wilson &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/rachaelwilson">http://twitter.com/rachaelwilson</a> (Environmental News Online)<br />
Martin Stabe &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/martinstabe">http://twitter.com/martinstabe</a> (Retail Week)<br />
Chris Green &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/chrisgreen">http://twitter.com/chrisgreen</a> (IT PRO)<br />
Patrick Smith &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/psmith">http://twitter.com/psmith</a> (paidcontent)<br />
Alison Gow &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/alisongow">http://twitter.com/alisongow</a> (Liverpool Daily Post)<br />
George Hopkin &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/GeorgeHopkin">http://twitter.com/GeorgeHopkin</a> (Johnston Press Plc)<br />
Steve O&#8217;Hear &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/sohear">http://twitter.com/sohear</a> (ZDNet)<br />
Michael Moran &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/blockbusterbuzz">http://twitter.com/blockbusterbuzz</a> (The Times)<br />
Jack Marshall &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/JackMarshall">http://twitter.com/JackMarshall</a><br />
David Woodward &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/davidjwoodward">http://twitter.com/davidjwoodward</a> (Director Magazine) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2008/11/uk-journalists-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banking and Finance is dead. Long live Digital</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2008/10/banking-and-finance-is-dead-long-live-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://stedavies.com/2008/10/banking-and-finance-is-dead-long-live-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prblogger.com/?p=1117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/17/digital-media-stephen-carter">Guardian</a> and <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/95b82b08-9c99-11dd-a42e-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">FT</a> (via <a href="http://www.rainierpr.co.uk/blog/2008/10/uk-government-in-bid-to-reboot-economy.html">Wadds</a>) the minister for communications, technology and broadcast, Stephen Carter, is planning to prepare a report called Digital Britain which, according to the FT, will help reboot the UK's battered economy from the credit crunch.

Backed by business secretary, Peter Mandelson, the Digital Britain report will address how to fund public-service broadcasting, super fast broadband and at its core an ambition to accelerate the rate of growth, and cement the UK's position as a world leader in the knowledge and learning economy.

I'm sure funding won't be a problem. A couple of billion here, a couple of billion there...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As reported in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/17/digital-media-stephen-carter"><span class="drop">G</span>uardian</a> and <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/95b82b08-9c99-11dd-a42e-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">FT</a> (via <a href="http://www.rainierpr.co.uk/blog/2008/10/uk-government-in-bid-to-reboot-economy.html">Wadds</a>) the minister for communications, technology and broadcast, Stephen Carter, is planning to prepare a report called Digital Britain which, according to the FT, will help reboot the UK&#8217;s battered economy from the credit crunch.</p>
<p>Backed by business secretary, Peter Mandelson, the Digital Britain report will address how to fund public-service broadcasting, super fast broadband and at its core an ambition to accelerate the rate of growth, and cement the UK&#8217;s position as a world leader in the knowledge and learning economy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure funding won&#8217;t be a problem. A couple of billion here, a couple of billion there.</p>
<p>Now that the City has pretty much had its day is this the dawning of a new kind of era in Britain? According to the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/3225320/Peter-Mandelson-City-dominance-must-end.html">Telegraph</a>, Mandelson&#8217;s plan is to introduce a new economic framework that relies less on the financial services industry and can take advantage of globalisation and the doubling in size of the future global economy.</p>
<p>In my opinion Britain is one of the best countries to be placed as a digital hub of innovation. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p><strong>Size </strong> &#8211; The UK is a small but densely populated island. Building new technical infrastructure to harness innovation would be less of an issue compared with much larger countries.  Super fast broadband would be relatively cheap to implement. (Relative to the money that we the taxpayer have had to pull out to bail out the greedy bankers)</p>
<p><strong>Wealth</strong> &#8211; Although only a small island (which always punches above its weight, mind you) the UK is still one of the richest countries with the fifth biggest economy in the world (according to the Economist).<br />
 <strong><br />
People</strong> &#8211; The UK&#8217;s economy is already service based with circa 70% of GDP generated by the service sector. Making the transition (if there is one to make) should be relatively smooth.</p>
<p><strong>Western</strong> &#8211; This sounds terrible but being a Western country and due to our education the UK is *supposedly* one of the most intelligent &#8211; although you wouldn&#8217;t think it talking to some of the people I once knew.</p>
<p><strong>Multicultural</strong> &#8211; No other country in the world welcomes other nationalities like the UK. No other capital city has as much ethnic and religious diversity as London. As the world becomes even smaller (as we know it is) this diversification will only stand the UK in good stead of being the innovation and technical powerhouse of the world.</p>
<p>Okay okay, hype and patriotism aside, I still think I make good case. Ten years from now we&#8217;ll look back at what went on in the financial markets with contempt, disgust and embarrassment.</p>
<p>And if we don&#8217;t then, well, we have learnt nothing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stedavies.com/2008/10/banking-and-finance-is-dead-long-live-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
