<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/</link>
	<description>the blog of consultant Stephen Davies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:02:45 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McComish</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve McComish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2540#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>Great post. I remember a couple of years ago The Economist predicted Hilary Clinton would be the next President of the United States. Doesn&#039;t exactly fill one with confidence in their predictive powers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I remember a couple of years ago The Economist predicted Hilary Clinton would be the next President of the United States. Doesn&#8217;t exactly fill one with confidence in their predictive powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timi Agama</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>Timi Agama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2540#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t understand why people persist in saying the financial crisis could not have been predicted. Don&#039;t be fooled by the experts who have a vested interested in making you believe that.

18 months before the proverbial hit the fan I was arguing that things were very wrong. And I&#039;m just a layman entrepreneur. And I was not alone. Some guest columnists predicted pain in the Financial Times. One was so audacious as to predict the collapse of a major US bank. And why were investors shorting Northern Rock stocks (whose model was a microcosm of the new financial order) if they thought the model worked? People knew the emperor had no clothes but were too embarrassed to talk. And still are.

I do agree that the BRIC economies are the story of the future. And I&#039;d also say that if you accept that then you begin to see that growth rates in the West will remain low for a sustained period. Like Craig says, it will be very difficult for the West to adjust. Which doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t. But Europe just doesn&#039;t have the psychological mindset at the moment. Things have been too comfortable and the kind of changes needed to stop the rise of the BRICs are just too radical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand why people persist in saying the financial crisis could not have been predicted. Don&#8217;t be fooled by the experts who have a vested interested in making you believe that.</p>
<p>18 months before the proverbial hit the fan I was arguing that things were very wrong. And I&#8217;m just a layman entrepreneur. And I was not alone. Some guest columnists predicted pain in the Financial Times. One was so audacious as to predict the collapse of a major US bank. And why were investors shorting Northern Rock stocks (whose model was a microcosm of the new financial order) if they thought the model worked? People knew the emperor had no clothes but were too embarrassed to talk. And still are.</p>
<p>I do agree that the BRIC economies are the story of the future. And I&#8217;d also say that if you accept that then you begin to see that growth rates in the West will remain low for a sustained period. Like Craig says, it will be very difficult for the West to adjust. Which doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t. But Europe just doesn&#8217;t have the psychological mindset at the moment. Things have been too comfortable and the kind of changes needed to stop the rise of the BRICs are just too radical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGill</title>
		<link>http://stedavies.com/2009/11/the-world-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2385</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stedavies.com/?p=2540#comment-2385</guid>
		<description>Good post - are you going to do one on Social Media? :-) - but I think the European dimension is going to be really interesting, though it&#039;s the rise of BRIC that I&#039;m really keeping my eye on as I think 2010 is going to see a lot of pain from a Western point of view as it really starts to sink in that we aren&#039;t the daddies any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post &#8211; are you going to do one on Social Media? <img src='http://stedavies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8211; but I think the European dimension is going to be really interesting, though it&#8217;s the rise of BRIC that I&#8217;m really keeping my eye on as I think 2010 is going to see a lot of pain from a Western point of view as it really starts to sink in that we aren&#8217;t the daddies any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
